If what you said is true, PLRD (Police Licensing and Regulatory Department) knows about this problem due to lots of feedback from the people, they should come out with their reasons why the rules is such.
They should be transparent and honest enough about this matter if they are really taking security matter seriously.
Like I mentioned before, with this ruling, people are unable to work because of the notifications. This will lead to shortage of manpower, which goes against the government’s wish to attract more people into the security industry.
The company that won the tender will have problem finding people to work and in turn, they will have to pay a hefty fine to PLRD. So is that the reason why they want to stick to this rule – to fatten their paycheck or for their own hidden agenda?
As for your point of hiring more people from the security agencies, that is like taking 2 steps back.
Cisco/Aetos use to handle most of the events before but right now there are many agencies that are doing events as well, which is a good sign in my opinion. If you hire people from the securities agencies, they will know all the loopholes for the tender and can pass on this information to their company or their cronies.
This will led to monopolization of the security industry market and will lead to stagnation of the pay. Unless you are a business owner, which works well for you as you are pulling in a big profit from the project,the rest of the security officer will surely feel dishearten to work conscientiously as the effort and time they put in do not match with the pay that they are getting.
Thus, the effort that the government put in to increase the wages through the PWM model will surely backfire due to monopolization.
Im sure the PLRD employs smart people to work for them as they had been keeping mum about this problem even though they know the problem is there.
Surely they can put their minds together to achieve a win-win situation for all, not only for themselves or their business partners/investors. By saying that PLRD knows about this problem and nobody can do anything about it,is like saying we are living in a communist country where the people have no say to the people who vote them in to do the job in the first place.
Let’s be fair to the common people who holds the pink i.c here to earn a proper living, getting paid their deserve salary for their effort and time that they put into their job. That is why now it’s seldom to hear security jaga or security guard but security officer. No point upgrading the title but pay still low/same.
If upgrading of skills and obtaining a proper license requires you to be restricted to work for 2 companies, is it fair to say to a competent person who holds a proper paperwork (degrees, PhD) that he can only hold 2 posts at a time?
That is to say that he/she can only be a board of director, C level management or minister but only 2 company at a time. Sounds ridiculous right?
I’m sorry that I do not have a solution to solve all this problem.
Surely it’s time to get the highly paid people to do a brainstorming session that will produce a satisfactory solutions and a happy ending for many more years to come. Especially with the rising level of threats in Asia now.
Not just sit around and collect heavy paycheck at the end of the month and finding fault with the people who is trying to make a living in Singapore, to be a better place for them and their families.
Editor’s note: This article is retrieved from a comment posted.Number of View: 1048