Support Site for The Unemployed & Underemployed
Wednesday June 19th 2013

Political reason why our government insists on 24 months of lengthy compulsory conscription?

Singapore now has the distinguished reputation of having one of the longest conscription period for its’ male citizens – 24 months.

We are also  one of the few countries in the world that still enforces conscription on its male citizens – and we are not at war with any one ever before.

The recent spate of accidental death involving peace-time NSF soldiers have also provided a bad image to the whole military force.

However, I was heartened to know that our NSF soldiers are now adequately compensated with an allowance of $480 for new recruits compared to the measly $90 I received during my time – almost thirty years ago.

Introduction

NCOs and officers used to serve 30 months as recent as two years ago but now most national servicemen (NSF) serve only 24 months on average when our government decided to reduce conscription period  as there was much resistance from the male population.

Prolonged conscription  slowed down the progress of our male population who has to wait till they complete their national service liabilty before they can continue with their tertiary education both locally or abroad.

By the time most males finished their university education, there are in their mid 20s whereas most of their female counterparts have  already graduated, started working and moving up the corporate ladder.

Those who study medicine may even graduate older –  when they hit 30 years old due to the long internship programme.

More signficantly, they still have to serve  the current 10-year reservist liability after NSF which can really interfere with one’s career and family.

There is also the recent online debate whether our reservists should fight so hard during a war-like situation when 1/3 of the country’s population are foreigners.

Of course, on a more positive note, NS will do alot of good to our current crop of young men who are seen as pampered and soft. We will never forget the NSF who allowed his maid to carry his army back pack for him and got  blasted  online for many weeks.

Reservist duties – disruption to one’s career and family

I have also heard in the latest news that  reservist officers now have to serve until 50 years old  further interfering with their career in the private sector.

This is perhaps one huge reason why our local employers prefer to hire foreigners over local staff as they don’t have to bother with the reservist liability of their executies which can go into 2-3 weeks of continuous absence from work.

If you are a small local SME consisting of five executives,  the prolonged absence of one key personnel can make or break your operation.

That is why many reservists try to defer their reservist liability until they have exhausted their deferment quota.

I remembered how one reservist friend hated having to return to serve the country regularly as a reservist  after NSF that he opted to be stationed  in Indonesia  for the long term so that he could defer his reservist duties. 

Back then, you could defer your reservist duties when you are living abroad for work assignment and he was away for a good ten years!

He was posted to the civil defence to serve out his reservist liability later on but it was a piece of cake compared to the many trips that some of us have to make to ROC for strenous overseas exercises.

I remembered not sleeping for 72 hours straight when we were deployed for an exercise in ROC and on the fourth day I could not even stand straight!

I slept for the next 24 hours without even bothering to wake up for my meals. I was just too tired…

Conscription – hard to escape

Not many male citizens I knew could escape conscription as even the most un-fit male has to go through NSF carrying out clerical duties except for one known case whereby he was totally exempted  from servicing a day of NSF.

He faked mental illnesses and managed to escape  conscription when the medical doctor gave him the no-go after interviewing him for many rounds. They fear that he would create havoc in the training ground.

He was probably the only one that I knew who managed to escape conscription totally and he was proud of it.

The army has a fitness classification  category from PES A – fittest to PES E – least fit. I am sure that the army  will try their best to fit in our male conscripts however obese or physically unhealthy they can be.

There are also a few friends who managed to escape reservist liability citing medical history  but these were also far and few in between.In fact, it is easier to lose your rifle during army exercise than get a permanent downgrade from reservist liability!

During my NS  days, I remembered spending half a year  of my remaining service idling around before my ROD and felt that it was a such a waste of time then.  I was a NCO then.

Though I benefitted from the physical nature of national service and was much toughened up by it, I felt that the length of the conscription was too long and  glad that national service was reduced from 30 months to 24 months for NCOS and officers few years ago.

Though we continued to perform our respective routine duties during the last few months of the service, nobody really bothered to disturb you or ask you to work harder as they knew that you are months away from your ROD.

In a way, my last few months  of national service was perhaps one of the most lazy period of my life! I went to camp, rested, waited for lunch at the cook house at 12 noon, napped till 2pm, woke up and waited till 5pm for camp book-out.

National service has now also became a hot national issue  for foreigners with permanent residence status. Right now, there are half a million PRs here with as many as 20, 000 male PRs below the age of 18 years old.

National service and our foreign PRs

Institute of Policy Studies (ISP) has recently conducted a study and found that half of the male permanent  residents below age 18 years old  will renounce their status when they reach NSF age in order to escape the drafting liability.

Of course, this has sparked off  an uproar from citizens here who have all along questioned  the loyalty of our foreign friends. It is unknown still how many male permanent residents have already renounced their PR status when they reach NSF liability.

By renouncing their PR status before conscription, these male foreigners risked having to leave their families permanently behind and not being able to take up any work opportunities here in future.

Singaporean male citizens who choose to live abroad when they are very young have to also post a $75,000 bond with the government and if they fail to return home for  conscription, they risk  forfeiting  the huge bond. They are also at risk of being arrested at the airport as failing to answer to the call for conscription is a crime.

However, the important question to ask is why do our government insists on having our  male citizens serve an average of 24 months of our most productive life span in the training field when potentially we are not in any war-like situation with our neigbhours?

Will reduced conscription attracts our male PRs to take up arms before they are offered citizenship?

Moreover, will our reservist force be any use if there is a war-like situation as we could only train 3 weeks in a year max and will no way be as militarily fit as our professional soldiers?  

I dread the day when  I will be activated for active reservist duty because of an external aggression. I also know that I am not in the best of shape plus skill-wise I will be rather rusty as I could only train a few weeks each year.

Ironically, when we are still insisting on a 24-month commitment to conscription, many countries have  started to reduce the peiod of compulsory conscription to ridiculously low level.

It is not difficult  to realise that conscription is a huge national burden imposed on our young shrinking male population especially when globalisation has adversely affects our employment opportunities here. Every day serves in the field is a day wasted in the working world.

Many male citizens have also questioned why they have to serve NS when foreigners are welcome to live among us as citizens without having to serve a day of NS in the field.

Conscription and other countries

Taiwan which is technically at war with China has recently reduced it’s national service liability from one year to only four months  from early 2015 – benefitting from the improved ties with China (Channel news asia 14 Dec 2011).

Taiwan intends to have a fully professional military service of 215,000 soliders down from the current 275,000 conscripted and professional soldiers at present.

As for Israel – military service  is mandatory, beginning at age eighteen, for male and female citizens and resident aliens. The length of compulsory military service has varied according to IDF personnel needs. In 1988 male conscripts served three years and females twenty months (Wikipedia).

However, its understandable why Israel has such a strong conscription philosophy as it is always in a war-like situation with surrounding Arabic countries. It will be terrible just to rely on trained professional soldiers to maintain peace in a region that is strifed with armed conflict. In fact, there are large military divisions that are staffed mostly with reservists and volunteers.

Conscription, or mandatory military service or compulsory national service, is legislated in South Korea, with military service stated as one of the Four Constitutional Duties (along with taxes, education, and labor) for all citizens. The current Conscription Law, however, applies only to males, although women are allowed to enroll in the Reserve Officer Training Corps as of 2010.[1]

It is administer by the Military Manpower Administration. There are two tiers of service: active duty or non-active duty service.[2] Length of service varies according to branches: 21 months for Army and Marine Corps, 23 months for Navy, 24 months for Air Force.[3] The non-active duty service, eg civil service or public service worker, is from 26 months to 36 months (Wikipedia).

The consciption period in South Korea has not changed even though the citizens have call for a reduction.

Again, South Korea has every reason to have a solid conscription programme as it is in a war-like situation with neigbouring North Korea – not unlike that of Israel.

Does Singapore requires such a lengthy conscription period?

But does Singapore – situated in a peaceful geographical region, warrants a rigorous conscription programme of 24 months on average? if it should be reduced, what is the desired length? 20 months? 18 months?

Since independence,  Singapore does not have the dreadful  opportunity to go to war with any neighbouring countries and many have commented that perhaps we have a strong deterrance force in the form of superior weaponry – purchased at exorbitant cost of more than 30% of our yearly budget.

The Defence Ministry continues to top the expenditure estimates list with S$12.3 billion set aside this year, which is four per cent higher than last year’s (defence budgetChannel news asia 18 Feb 2012).

I can’t seen to find any figure for the size of our professional army but  my estimate is that it will probably reach 20,000 to 30,000 in numbers.

The army has being trying to attract qualified young people to join them as prfoessioanl soldiers and I heard that starting pay for local graduates are in the mid $3000s plus you get a handsome gratuity when you have finish   your contract.

A friend of mine who finished off as a major engineer managed to receive a golden handshake of half a million dollars after serving in the air force for well over 20 years!

He later joined DSO but earned only 3/4 of his regular army pay which wasn’t that bad as he may even get less than half if he joins the private sector at the matured age of 50 years old.

The professional army pays well and it should be as there are lots of sacrifices involved.

Many people have say that once you sign on with the army they will want your body, soul and blood.

So the important question to ask is why does our government still insists on having a lengthy conscription period when we are having so much peace regionally?

So is pure deterrance the only reason for the lengthy conscription as given the limited size of our population there is a limit to how large our professional army can grow to?

Moreover, our immediate neighbouring countries like Malaysia and Indonesia do not have sconsciption but relies on a professional army to defend themselves.

Many military analysts have speculated that because Singapore is such a small country it has always to be on its toe and ready to defend itself against any potential aggressor – however far-fetched it might be.

Moreover, Singapore will never ever be able to recover after entering into a war-like situation with any neigbhouring country because of our strategic  location.

Our limited  geographical space will also not allow any protracted war to be fought on our island. It will be disastrous to have a war situation occurring around our highly-populated HDB flats and congested MRT trains.

Foreigners will probably be the first to run off followed by our wealthy citizens with overseas PRs.

Political reason for lengthy conscription?

Yet some sceptics have came out with the theory that serving national service has forced our male citizens to stay very compliant and obedient – even in the face of some recent horrendous policies.

We witnessed how plane-loads of foreigners descended on our tiny island taking away jobs, homes and even treasured  relationships without even a slight whimper from our people.

Why does our people harbour such deep-seated inertia in the face of  some recent damaging policies? Even some of my foreigner friends who are long-term PRS here have expressed shock that the locals accepted the policies almost in resignation and without a fight.

We  saw how the Arab Spring civil uprising – instigated  mostly by brave young men fresh out of universities -  caused some centuries-old empires to topple.

Our government has taken the smart step of locking away idealistic active young men when they turn 18 and put them away for 24 months in a military camp for conditioning.

In the online medical dictionary:-

Aversive conditioning  is described as learning in which punishment or other unpleasant stimulation is used to reduce the frequency of an undesirable response.

During our army training, we learn alot of aversive conditioning whereby if we step out of line or disobey intructions from our officers, we will be punished. 

This form of negative conditioning probably follows us after our ROD and tend to stay with us through our adulthood so much so that we don’t question authorities anymore.

All of us know that young people between the ages of 16  to 18  years old are often rash, emotional and tend to move in groups. They flare up easily and are very vocal when their rights are slighted.

After serving out their national service, you  will notice  how our adventurous creative boys have turn into obedient compliant boring men.

More seriously, all individual rights of our young men are stripped off once they don on the army fatigued uniform as they blend in together as one compliant obeying force.  Either they die or survive together – there is no more individual voice anymore when you serve in the army.

That is probably why you seldom hear of  any subversive voice coming out of the masses and even if it comes up it will usually be alone and faint. We don’t want to be seen as standing out from the crowd – after being conditioned for 24 months in the army to blend in with our uniformed buddies.

Thus,  it is not surprising to hear that our young male graduates are often on the complaint list of many employers for being uninspiring, uncreative and unmotivated.

In fact, our female local  counterparts are seen to be more assertive, inspirational and domineering than our male peers! For example, my previous three bosses that I worked for in different companies were all females and they also report to their own female bosses above them!

Our young male graduates  also need alot of instructions from their bosses and are often clueless when left alone to manage problems – understandable after being conditioned in the army for 24 months  to always listen to instructions from their officers and not to act on your own initiative.

When Transitioning staged a series of protests at Hong Lim Park recently against the foreign influx, less than 20% of the participants were below 40 years old and the attendance seldom reached 150 people.

Though many thousands  lambasted at the pro-foreign policies of our government online, less than 10% will take the important step of venturing out of the comfort  of their bedrooms – it feels strange to go against the authorities here in the open.

If you do that in the army, you will likely end up in the guard room. Many brave young men became nervous wrecks after spending a week in the dreadful guard room and I don’t blame them.

I heard that the guardroom  is a terrifying  place and you have to march almost half the day round the square under the hot sun.

The two years of army conditioning of obeying orders and  rules have caused many of our young men to toe the line – even when they have long left the army.

We are taught in the army that if you disobeyed rules however silly they could be, you will be in trouble.

I was  also affected by this conditioning phenomenon so much so that when I came out to work later on, I merely took instructions from my superiors and never questioned why I have to do them.

Suffice to say, I was very uninspiring in my work and merely became a worker than a trail blazer. I even feared some managers who tend to talk loudly as they reminded me of my senior army WOs!

I lalso acked initiatives probably blunted by my compliant nature long conditioned in the army camp and naturally I failed miserably in the creativity department both at work and  in my personal life.

I am not saying that we should disobey all the orders of our superiors in the army and became a rebel but when it affects how we think and behave whenever we see someone in uniform or  authority then something is psychologically wrong with us.

The fear to question authority here is also disturbing as not everyone high up in power is correct. Just think of Hitler and Mao Tze Dong and you will get the drift.

Governments are also very afraid of mass revolts as it can turn ugly very quickly and difficult to contain when it goes out of hand. That is probably why our government will go through all means to suppress any potential uprising as it has the likely chance of toppling a regime.

We should be questioning why such a rule or policy is in force especially  when we feel that it is not right and we should be bold enough to question  the authorities about it using all means possible.

Right now, though many Singaporeans have awakened from their political slumber and began to speak up abeit via the internet, there is still a sizeable population out there who wants to stay out of trouble by remaining uninvolved until they are hit with the same problem.

I have first-hand experience of this phenomenon when I interacted almost on a daily basis with jobless PMETs.

Many of them  who are in their 40s only began to wake up when they were  out of job and felt the foreign onslaught.

 Before that, when they are gainfully employed, they are oblivious of  the impact of  our negative pro-foreign policies even though they may have read of it in the news.

Our self-centred nature may have  play a big part in our unhealthy inertia which has allowed  the government to dictate  what they want to do as there is  hardly any current strong opposition influence in Parliament to check them.

As for the unhealthy army influence, for a long time  the look of any uniform  - like the ones that are wore by the police officers have  also cause  me to behave  properly  in front of them as they reminded me of my no-nonsense army officers in uniform during my NS.

I only managed to break out of this unhealthy compliant nature when I left to stay abroad for a period. It was a healthy breathe of democratic fresh air in Sydney as the police was also both  friendly and approachable.

I remembered two police officers on bicyles greeted me when I jogged past them in my residential area in Sydney!

You will never see that happening in Singapore – our policemen are always scrowling as they patrol the grounds as if they own the land.

I  began to wonder how far  we have drifted away from the true-blue democratic values that modern developed countries embody.

Conditioning is such a powerful psychological tool which the ruling party has always used to good effect.

Seeing how other suppressed Arabian countries fell so easily when the young people take to the streets in revolt recently, our government will try all means to contain any subversive elements from rising up and seize political advantage.

The Marxist conspiracy has  also caused many people to look behind their shoulders whenever  they talked about the negative stuff  of our government.

In fact, it has caused Singapore to move backwards in democratic terms for at least a decade!

More seriously, it has also allowed the ruling party to cement their grip in power for a good two decades after the mass Marxist arrest as no one dares to step out to challenge the authorities during general election until GE 2011.

Conclusion

So the next time when you are returning for reservist duties, ask yourself when you put on the uniform, what psychological effect does it  has on you?

Chances are it will cause you to properly behave yourself and be very compliant as a person and citizen.

You then have to ask yourself is that all good…especially  when  we know that the current regime has being misgoverning for a long while?

Remember that not everyone in high authorities are doing everything just for the country’s good sake…

Again think of Hitler and Mao Tze Dong.

Written by: Gilbert Goh

Reader Feedback

12 Responses to “Political reason why our government insists on 24 months of lengthy compulsory conscription?”

  1. Def says:

    U hit the nail on the head gilbert. These days NS is mainly a political tool for brainwashing n propaganda. It’s also a major stumbling block for creativity n risk taking. Imagine steve jobs going thru NS – he will either end up in DB or become like a sinkie.put

    As for medical status, as long as u can walk n see, u r considered combat fit. I have irregular heartbeat n moderate blood disorder n I declared it but was still assigned pes A! I went thru 2.5 yrs as officer in combat unit. I have a jc classmate whose right leg was amputated due to childhood illness. He was made to serve as clerk in a wheelchair. I also come across white horse skivers who are in tip-top fitness but get high level private specialist downgrade to pes E for ridiculous diagnosis. I personally come across pes E white horses due to allergic to saf uniform and allergic to grass. But these jokers can represent safra in water polo, dragon boat n football!

    I stupidly went thru Ns as an obedient officer. Until when I ROD and I tried to buy insurance, all the insurance companies imposed extra loading on the insurance premiums. Even after showing them my 2.5 yrs combat NS service, running 10km in sbo, helmet, rifle and running SOC below 10min etc. Immediately I found a senior specialist and got myself downgraded. I challenged the saf medical board to give me a certificate of perfect health if they didn’t want to downgrade me. They didn’t dare – after all most of the medical board are reservists themselves, and more importantly none of them dare to contradict ng specialist who was one of the top specialist in his field at that time. Yes even in saf medical board and regular saf MOs, there is still politics and nobody want to harm their own potential medical careers and burn bridges with established well-known specialists in the industry.

  2. batman says:

    Imo, 12 months is good enough for NCOs and privates, and additional 6 months for officers.
    Bonding and additional skills can be pick up during reservist stints.

  3. Ah Huat says:

    Gilbert, you are not quite correct to say that male Singaporeans who go overseas at a young age need to post a $75k bond in order to remain overseas. That only applies if you are applying to remain overseas for more than two years. So, to circumvent that, you apply for an exit permit of 1 year 11 months. Furthermore, once the child has obtained foreign citizenship and makes a declaration that he will be renouncing Singapore citizenship at the age of 21, Mindef will grant him an exit permit through to the age of 16.5 years whereby he will need to register for NS. Once he registers, Mindef will again grant him an exit permit through to his 21st birthday where thereafter if he renounces then there will be no further NS liabilities.

    Also, your questioning of the loyalty of the PRs is in itself questionable. Fact: They are not Singapore citizens. Fact: They remain citizens of their respective countries despite having PR status in Singapore. So why is there an expectation of loyalty to Singapore from them?

  4. Lim Peh says:

    The author failed to take into account the fact that the role of the SAF as a whole, extends far beyond just defending our own borders. SAF also has the responsibility of ensuring general stability in the region whether we like it or not. Our neighbors have shown time and again they can be unpredictable and Indonesia, though today they are on our side, has the potential to head the other direction. We are located right between one large Muslim nation and another gigantic one. We also have the responsibility of defending the Straits of Malacca as our livelihood depends on that. Its not all about defending HDB blocks and estates. If things come to that level, we are certainly in for a rough ride as we lack strategic depth. SAF is designed to achieve air superiority over our neighbors quick if the need should arise and to take the fight to their lands, not sit back and wait for them to get here. Stop thinking WW2.

    U may also not realize that SAF’s role was expanded back in ’79 when Vietnam invaded Cambodia with USSR backing and we were looking at a potential Vietnamese invasion of Thailand. SAF deployed joint patrols with Thailand back then itself as we were looking at a scenario that largely mirrored the Japanese invasion of this region. Today the USSR is gone and Vietnam is a friend, but China has replaced both as a new threat. If u had been paying attention to the South China Sea fracas, u’d certainly realize that this region is not as friendly as what u’d like to think. Even the Israelis think this is a disaster area.

    And before u keep pushing for the disbandment of NS thanks to a few local issues, please pay more attention to the region. Military procurement has increased among all our neighbors, the Indonesians, Malaysians and Australians have all increased their military budget. War is something nobody ones for sure, since everyone is economically tied to each other one way or the other. But u can’t forget the saber-rattling that will never end. Downsizing the SAF would certainly lower our defensive capabilities and we’d lose the edge we have over our neighbors in any kind of negotiation.

    I hate our government myself, don’t get me wrong. I think of them as a bunch of screwups who failed in many levels when it comes to national policies and protecting our citizens. But defense is a different matter. They got that one RIGHT for sure. We are not in a position to decide whether we should have NS or not. A powerful SAF is our only deterrent against any threats. Though most of our locals fail to recognize the importance of the SAF, both our neighbors do know and acknowledge that its a superior fighting force to what they have. This is an opinion shared by military analysts all over, be it the US, Australia or even India. And that’s been keeping us safe so let’s stop taking our defense for granted.

    • Anon says:

      Talk so much but still lose to one basic reality:
      Jobs and scholarships for foreigners, NS and debt slavery for Sinkies.

      What’s the point of fighting and defending when
      40% of the overall population are foreigners;
      50% of the working population are foreigners;
      highest income gap in the world;
      many well educated and experienced Sinkies not able to get living wage even if willing to work hard & smart;
      refusal of govt to acknowledge fundamental problems and implement real solutions, instead of simply doing cosmetic change, display crocodile tears, and then going back to business as usual.

      Frankly if got invasion, my unit and me will be the first to surrender and welcome integration into the new country.

      • R Lim says:

        Dear Anon,

        You speak the language of treachery. Well done!

        Welcome the invaders huh, welcome them here to rape our women and enslave our children, Pillage and plunder our land?

        Are you thinking with your head? or your arse, your traitorous clown?

        • jj@39 says:

          For me, it really depends on which country is attacking Singapore & what they can offer to us. Then i will decide whether to retaliate or runaway or surrender.

  5. Parka says:

    Excellent article.

  6. chillax says:

    Wow Gilbert, your article is worthy for submission as a scholarly article for Jane’s Defence weekly. It is indeed another angle to look at conscription in Singapore. i did 2.5yrs and i hated every sec of it. but i always thought conscription was to keep the youth unemployment rate low

  7. Sye says:

    when is China a threat when it got its hands full with Korea, Japan, Russia, Taiwan and the US? The real threat comes from the US should it decides to invade the world through force of arms. No powers are more powerful than the US, not ever.

  8. marcos says:

    A very well written article!

  9. Think strategic says:

    Reducing NS period? How long do you think it would take for you to be trained and ensure that you be at your best and return safely during a war scenario. 6 months? 9? 12? I believe you wld want it to be as long as possible as you need to be dam sure you are trained to the best ability for your safe return so that u can still be with your family.

    For those who have done NS and actually think hard about what if we go to war today, you wld shit brinks and proclaim that 2 yrs is insufficient and wish your training wld be longer.o what is the right balance? Don’t think just about yourself but look at the big picture.

    I am ashamed to read those post written by Singaporeans (Anan& jj@39). I am disgusted to leant that these so called Singaporeans are worth fighting for, matter of fact, I wld not hesitate to count them as acceptable attrition. What’s worst, if Anon & jj are those who frequently criticize foreighner, I think you are worse because a traitor is a worse enemy that an enemy himself. At least I wld not be stab from behind by my enemy. I can’t say the same for a traitor. Am sure you know what I mean. (Disclaimer : I didn’t say this to proclaim that foreigners are enemies, but it is an illustration.)

    Let me post this illustration to those who questioned : ” there are so many foreigners in Singapore, so what’s there to defend”….you have a house and you left it vacant because you were away for holiday. when you returned, you realise that there were people living in your house, who has just lay a claim to it since they are living in it. From what I gather, Anon & jj wld just walk away and give the house to the intruder. Perhaps jj may become the new house owner’s maid since he so eager to surrender.

    I consider Singapore my home and I WILL do my best to defend it like I wld defend my family and wld not want another WW2 where our woman were forced to do things that you wouldn’t wish your sister or mother would do. Read the history and you wld know what atrocity war can do. Then again I guess jj won’t mind sharing his family females with the ones he surrender to; he only cares about himself, right? Also, do you think all the foreign workers wld remain in Singapore if a war is eminent?

    Having said these, lets revisit my opening words…” How long does it take to train a man to be a fighting fit soldier good enough for war?” If you are the staedfast sort that will defend your turf,It would never be long enough. However, if you are Anon, jj and many others against NS, a day is 1 day too long. Like the cyber world, war scenarios are constantly evolving and ever changing thus the need to do reservist; ensure fitness and updates.

    I wonder those who suggested 12 months and extra for officers….where did they pluck these figures from? I am guessing it is a guess with no thot. It only shows their depth and immaturity and the kind of generation Singaporean has turned disappointedly into.

    While I say this, I feel there’s a compromise to everything. I do not know what is the best compromise as I am not privy to any detail studies put forth by our policy makers. But I do know that, training will never be long enough.

    As the original author has mentioned that professional SAF pays well, but he fail to realise if 71600 active personnel (info from wikipedia) is sufficient to fight the war? Well if he has opted to join the SAF, perhaps it will then be 71601. In a small nation like ours, everyone counts, unlike the US, so we can’t compare as we are different.

    On the comment that Singapore is situated is a peaceful geographical position gives rise to complacency and take peace for granted. Situation can explode anytime if you do not have a sizeable and deterrent force.

    Like the illustration I posted, wld you have ensured someone (strong enough or can be a deterant factor) be home to look after your property if as what Lim Peh has mentioned that his neighbour might be the perceived threat? (I am not even talking about locks as deterant and security cameras cams as it serve no purpose in this illustration). In addition, wld you attempt to befriend your neighbours so as to minimise having them as a threat and also they can help you look out for one another. Would you have, on special occasions (eg New Years or religious occasions), give some goodies to your neighbours in an effort to make peace and gain some goodwill? Would you also attempt to ensure you have your influential and mafia friend visit you as a show to others that you have connections? Would you also want to make sure, your mafia friend has an interest in your house eg you can help him store his most precious antique so that if anyone tries to attack your house, your mafia friend will help you defend it too?

    What are all these efforts called? Strategis economic and military corporation and alliance.

    Give it a thought….your home is ALWAYS worth defending and there can be no price tag on such a matter. Do your job and let the professional do theirs.

Leave a Reply