Frankly, I was slightly surprised at the strong reaction of Singaporeans towards Mr Lee Kuan Yew’s comment on the issue of foreign talents: “Foreign talent allows Singaporeans to punch above its weight” (Yahoo Singapore 22 Jul). I just checked today that there were about 1,500 comments on the Yahoo Singapore website and most were anti-foreign talent. The article must have been read by more than 30, 000 Singaporeans.
Singapore has a low unemployment rate of around 1.7% currently but the government has an ambiguous way of recording its’ statistics and there are many gaps that remain unanswered. Transitioning.org continues to receive many emails from readers stating that they are jobless and some were replaced by foreigners.
I remembered working in Central Singapore CDC few years ago and we used to get instructions to delete the database for those who remained on the unemployment list for more than six months – regardless of whether they are working or not. This showed plainly that the unemployment statistics collected is flawed and there are more people unemployed than officially recorded.
This piece of news probably overshadowed the killing of 92 Norwegians which happened about the same time as Mr Lee’s comments. This also reflected the significance of Mr Lee’s views as many have speculated that he still carries much weight even though he has stepped down from the current cabinet. His past policies have left a huge imprint that will be difficult to erase even though he is not seen as active in the current governance anymore.
It is apparent that many Singaporeans are still somewhat affected by the issue of foreign workers as besides the intense competition they pose at the job front, their presence is also acutely felt on our clogged transport services and the sky-high resale HDB flats as permanent residents can buy our flats now. Many MRT trains are now largely filled by foreigners as local Singaporeans prefer to buy their own cars – more to escape from the foreign invasion on our MRT trains than anything else.
Even if you are a civil servant – largely unaffected by foreigner staffing, you can still feel their presence as you have to move around the island state and chances are you will bump into them even if you drive as I heard that many foreigners now also drive. Some of the salaries of our foreign workers bordered on the ridiculous – their starting salaries can be about $5000 and this does not include housing allowances!
More significantly, most Singaporeans also felt “sold out” as foreigners began to invade our transport system, homes, jobs, shopping malls, play ground, nurseries, schools and hospitals. This is a dangerous phenomenon which the government is trying to balance as it is apparent that there is still very little integration between the locals and foreigners. Many foreigners I saw tend to stick with their own kind even though this is unadvisable.
There is also the belief that foreigners bring with them more crimes as our island state is suddenly besieged with extremely horrible murders such as the infamous watertank murder of a foreign maid. Bodies were found all over the island and most of them belonged to foreigners.
At the local job front, many Singaporeans also feel that more can be done to protect the welfare of our own local workers first before inviting foreigners to our shore. The fact that some of the jobs performed by foreigners can be done by local workers also irked many as it means there is no level playing ground when it comes to hiring competition.
Using the Employment Pass (EP), employers can now hire 100% foreigner workers without any consideration for the welfare of local workers. Some readers have wrote in stating that they are the minority workers in their companies. Companies such as Land Transport Authority. Hans Cafe, Singapore Computer Services, Dutsche bank, Barclays Capital among others are largely staffed with foreign workers – especially in the IT department. Many hiring managers are also foreigners and they tend to bring their own kind to the workforce.
I recently visited a Hans cafe at Tampines and was saddened to see that it is 100% staffed by foreigners – jobs that many Singaporeans can perform as well if not better. Employers apparently prefer to hire cheaper, younger and faster foreign staff over our older Singaporeans – at the same cost and why not? Given a choice, no sane employer will not capitalise on such employment ease to save cost and improve productivity. The government has enabled employers to hire foreigners so easily that our local workers felt displaced and left out.
Employers have also all along cried out that there are not enough Singaporean workers answering to their advertisement for workers. A check with the advertisement reveals that the pay is not only inadequate but the working hours are tortuous. This is probably why 70% of the jobs at our two integrated resorts are filled by foreigners.
A 62-year-old friend took up work as a service crew at the casino in Sentosa two years ago and his pay is a paltry $1100 a month. He was fortunately only required to work two shfits due to his age – most of his younger foreign colleagues has to work three shifts.
The term “foreign talents” also remain murky as if the work carried out by the foreigners can also be performed by local workers how then can they be called “foreign talents”? Many foreigners took over our jobs as customer service officers, waiters, administrators, clerks among others – jobs that do not really require much talent at all.
To Mr Lee Kuan Yew, all that matters is economics and I believe that Mr Lee Hsein Loong also has that bearing when it comes to the issue of foreign workers. The financial industry has hired tens of thousands of workers and their income I heard is no peanuts: most are paid at $5, 000 or more excluding housing allowances!
Yet ironically, cost remains one of the main consideration when companies consider hiring foreigners and the need to implement minimum wage must be seen as a crucial protective cushion for our local workers. Without minimum wage, employers can hire foreigners using the low salary platform to deter our local workers from stepping out to apply for many service jobs available now. Foreign workers from many poor third world countries will flock to our island state even if the salary is as low as $800 a month with only two off days and a 12-hour work day. It is still better than slaving away in their own countries where the pay is only less than $200 a month.
In Sydney where I stayed for 2 years, it is really difficult to hire foreigners as they need to produce evidence of interviews and they can be hired only if the company has tried for 6 months to hire local Australians. The company also has to post a bond on the foreigner worker when the work permit is processed. Little wonder that there are fewer foreigners in Australia these days as the government is trying to curb its influx due to rising unpopularity at having too many foreigners at their shore. In fact, the Howard government lost the election due to its’ foreigner-friendly immigration policy.
Mr Lee has been a noted advocate of the foreign talent policy due mainly to economic reason. Most Singaporeans will know that he was the one who preferred that our optimal population should be six million.
Yet there are many Singaporeans who realise that there is a main hidden agenda for having more foreigners in our midst. As many as 150, 000 foreigners became naturalised citizens during the past 5-6 years and they are eligible voters – these new voters will mostly vote for the ruling party out of gratitude.
I remembered my NSP colleague Steve Chia informing me that foreigners make up 30% of the voters at Pioneer SMC during the recent election. I trusted him as I joined in his campaigning for three days. We came across many flat owners who were Filipino, Indian, Chinese, Thai and Mymarese among others.
I realised that Steve has a tough chance of winning Pioneer SMC as most foreigners who became citizens will not vote for him. It is natural for them to vote for the one who provided them the golden chance of a life time at turning their lives around.
More worrying, the government seems to have lost its economic bearing as it continues to depend on the growing service sector to strengthen its GDP. As many as 70% of last year’s 170, 000 jobs created belonged to the service sector - a sector that depends on cheap manpower. Foreign investors continue to flock to the island state and start all kinds of businesses and their main attraction is the availability of cheap labour. We all know too well that cheap labour means foreign workers and the economic growth does not seem to have benefit the local workforce at all.
Our local workers continue to struggle with low wages as more than 350, 000 workers aged above 40 years old earn less than $1500 and below a month. More than 400, 000 Singaporeans workers applied for workfare last year – a state-funded welfare incentive scheme that supplements the wages of low-waged local workers to the tune of $2,800 a year. Applicants must earn $1,700 and below and must be above 35 years old. However, as much as 70% of the workfare money comes in the form of CPF contribution and thus it does not really provide any financial relief to our cash-strapped workers.
There are also many political analysts who observed that the issue of foreign talents could polarise the society further and many Singaporeans will continue to leave the country by the tens of thousands yearly. Many also commented that the influx of foreigners may cause the government to be toppled by the next election or that their majority votes will drop to below 60%.
As Singapore grabbles with another five years of PAP governance, my heart goes out to the many thousands of Singaporeans who are unemployed right now. Do email me at gilbert@transitioning.org if you need our counselling or coaching services.
We are here for you – even though our own government does not.
Written by: Gilbert Goh











I will never believe the local newspapers reporting about the low percentage of unemployment in Singapore. There are far too many jobless people around and yet the authority refused to help these jobless Singaporean. It is a very sad thing to say – born a Singaporean but benefits goes to foreigners.
Michael Haas, a political analyst not affiliated with any of the local universities here, once mused as a part of his research that the approach of “economics at all cost, even at the expense of local citizens”(especially native born Singaporeans) will be the undoing of the PAP party one day. I am not sure how people here in Singapore would be aware of this statement or prediction, considering that such critical literature is often not even allowed in the country. But as much as some Singaporeans(even the pro-opposition ones) are sceptical about it, the tides of change are coming faster than imagined. A former opposition politician turned American citizen, Gopalan Nair, has stated that this atmosphere of “I talk down, you stop questioning” will bring about civil disobedience(not in the form of strikes or demonstrations maybe), but that that disobedience will result in mass exoduses of Singaporeans overseas to study, work or even eventually live as residents of another country, and then, the government resorting to importing even more lower-grade foreigners from the 3rd world countries around us in greater numbers. I might not agree with all that he said, but I think there is a grain of truth in that such economics at all costs will only backfire one day. “When” is in itself a question.
No one gave me an answer when I asked for a revolution.
Hi Gilbert,
We are also here for YOU, if you call up for a change.
Those who left Singapore are quiters. They left and foreigners took over.
This economy is suspect.We gave up agriculture, have no resources.We are giving up manufacturing.One day, Bio engineering will be overtaken by others, and we’ll have to give it up too. Everyone want to be managers, bankers. Engineers and scientists take a back seat. The economy is based on people.Service sector should not be the main economic driver. Only by increasing the people, will the economy seems healthy. Even if 6 million people is reached, it wont stop at 6 million, its like a speeding MRT that lost the brakes. People are optimistic that technology will solve tomorrow’s problems, but they forgotten about the intangibles. One of which is environment degradation. During flu season, someone spit on the road,anyone pass by will pick up the deadly germs. Whose fault is this ? Our forests and nature reserves will become botak. I do feel we have very unusual high proportions of residential areas and industries are decreasing. The money comes from building more condos, but where are the industries ?
It is not like Singaporeans don’t want to procreate, it seems like we reached a matured population level for a developed nation, but the authorities are artificially pumping up the numbers to make the economy look good. I think developed nations have a 2%-3% growth only but not sure about this. btw, I think we shouldn’t call Sg “first world nation” so that people will not flock here due to some stats saying that sg very good in stats. Singapore is gonna be one of the most densely populated countries in the world. now it is in second place.
@Vince, I think you have an issue with yourself. People who leave in the name of practicality have every right to do so. No one can ever call them quitters just because they did not throw their lot down here when they had a better chance overseas. That is, unless to begin with, you have thrown your lot together with the politicians who use the figure of speech of “quitters” here. As for what you said about number and percentages, you are talking about the ‘economics at all costs’ approach used by the current PAP government, which tells us that things “cannot be helped” and that we have to bear with it as citizens. No one in the right mind will just bear with it, unless he or she is living in his or her comfy castle without a care for others around them.
I’d think the proper term is “economic refugees” i.o. quitters. Just my o.o2 cents.
Heres an excerpt from
http://www.economicrefugee.net/what-does-economic-refugee-mean/
“An economic refugee is a person that has fled his or her country of origin, seeking to escape oppressive poverty. Having tried everything else to fight for change in the living conditions of their original countries, the only option that many immigrants, i.e. economic refugees, find themselves with is to ensure the survival and well-being of their families and thus join or take refuge..”
[...] I chanced upon your article “Why many Singaporeans are irked by LKY’s remarks on foreign talent“. [...]
@Vince: If Singaporeans who leave the island to look for a better life elsewhere are “quitters”, what does that make the thousands of outsiders who have done the same coming to Singapore?
don’t be disturbed by foreign invasion.it is actually a ground for local talent to raise their own skill bar.The results are always positive and improvement noticed , when there is a good competition. It brings out the best..why locals should have inferiority complex..compete and make your country proud and show that you are second to none. since singapore is a great country -thats the reason more outsiders are coming..u should be proud of yr country…how many foreigners plan to go to countrie nearby to singapore..dont fret..
Out of the 8 staff from my department retrenched in the past 2 years, only ONE was a foreigner! 7 true blue Singaporeans lost their jobs because we simply cost more. When will the PAP reach out to help PMEs who are loyal citizens and have served NS for more than 20 years (including our annual In Camp Training stints)? When???
I do not even know the way I stopped up right here, however I assumed this publish was once great. I don’t understand who you are however definitely you’re going to a well-known blogger if you are not already. Cheers!
If I change my citizenship to being a Filipino or Indian, would it be easier for me to find a job in Singapore? I was born a Singaporean btw, must be due to bad Karma in past lives.
if im a degree holder from burma, malaysia, phillipine, china or india ….of course spore will be my first destination to kick start my career, give it a try for 5 years and see how it goes.