Posted on September 19, 2009 by Abhijit
Nowhere in the world are you more likely to run into a millionaire than in Singapore. But the great majority of households in the city-state earn less than Singapore’s average household income.
How can the majority earn less than the average? Is it because some are very rich?
Singapore had the highest concentration of millionaires last year, with 8.5 percent of the country’s households owning more than $1 million, reports the Boston Consulting Group. Switzerland was second, with 6.6 percent, followed by Kuwait, 5.1 percent, United Arab Emirates, 4.5 percent, and the United States, 3.5 percent.
With such a profusion of millionaires, of course, Singapore is rich, very rich.
Last year, the average monthly household income was 7,090 Singapore dollars (about $5010) for resident households and 7,750 Singapore dollars for employed households, according to a paper published by the Singapore Department of Statistics. Resident households denote Singaporeans and permanent residents and employed households are those where at one least one member is employed.
Incomes were increasing, said the same paper, pointing out:
“In 2007, 33 percent of employed households earned a monthly income of at least 7,000 Singapore dollars. In 2008, 39 percent of employed households earned a monthly income of at least 7,000 Singapore dollars.”
But that means 61 percent – or the great majority – earned less than the average household income.
Indeed, the median income – the income of half the households – was considerably less.
The median monthly household income, according to the same paper, was 4,950 Singapore dollars for resident households and 5,480 Singapore dollars for employed households.
The paper explained: “The median household income refers to the income in the middle of the income distribution, that is, half of the households have higher income than the median household income and half have lower income than the median household income.”
Still, things were looking up, said the paper.
The income gap last year narrowed for the first time since 1998, it said: The Gini coefficient dropped from 0.489 in 2007 to 0.481 in 2008. “This decline reflects the faster income growth among the 21st to the 90th percentile of employed households,” it added.
But the highest income group earned more than 17 times as much as the lowest income group. See these figures taken from the paper.
| Average monthly household income from work among employed households |
| Decile | 2007 Singapore dollars |
2008 Singapore dollars |
| 1st to 10th | 1,220 | 1,310 |
| 11th to 20th | 2,240 | 2,480 |
| 21st to 30th | 3,040 | 3,430 |
| 31st to 40th | 3,970 | 4,430 |
| 41st to 50th | 4,900 | 5,460 |
| 51st to 60th | 5,880 | 6,730 |
| 61st to 70th | 7,140 | 8,040 |
| 71st to 80th | 8,730 | 9,720 |
| 81st to 90th | 11,330 | 12,910 |
| 91st to 100th | 20,440 | 23,020 |










The rich getting richer….and the poor getting poorer.
Worst case scenario…if you’re born to a poor family in Spore. What is the chances of becoming rich or being poorer?
The chances is getting poorer due to the high rising cost in Singapore.
My parent have not completed a Primary School education but have a HDB 4 room flat with 2 children.
I am a degree graduate & my wife is a Polytechnic Diploma graduate earning much more then my parent but only can afford a HDB 3 room flat with 2 children.
Am I incompetent or the fault is due to high raising cost in Singapore?
If it is due to high raising cost in Singapore, what is the government doing now to help us the Singapore Citizens when Minister(s) & Member(s) of Parliament monthly salary is more then my annual salary?
Where do these millionaires come from???…How many Sporeans live under poverty if 1/6 is millionaire? If Spore is a rich nation, there should not be anyone living under poverty? Its pity to see old people still working…